In The Spotlight

Boxing vs MMA

written by admin
30

Recently, psycho asked what boxer's think of MMA in the forums.  I've moved the conversation here to get more opinions.  I'm actually surprised it took this long for this topic to come up.  Every other boxing site I've been to eventually gets into this debate.

On the one hand, you have the purist boxers who are completely against MMA.

On the other are the MMA fanatics who believe boxing has gone the way of the dodo.

And somewhere in the middle are the people who see them for what they are.  Two completely different sports, both of which could learn a thing from the other.


Randy Couture: See what a top MMA has
to say about the debate
Boxing actually evolved out of something a lot closer to UFC type fights than the average boxing fan would be willing to admit.  Gloves were an innovation.  In the beginning, fights that lasted entire days and the bloodfest resulting from leather wrapped hands were the norm.  Boxing since has been civilized.  When UFC first came out, I believe it was the shock value that caused people to watch.  It took the characters from WWF and threw reality into the equation.  The result was comical at best.  Since then, it has come a long way in regulating the sport and turning it into a real contender in terms of ratings and economics.  This is due in large part to a hugely effective marketing plan.

Boxing has stagnated in that regard.  The problem I see is that boxing lacks the lustre and character present in the UFC.  Personally, the characters in UFC which are no more than a reinvention of what the WWF provides, seem to take away from the sport, but that's just me.  From a business perspective, it is a goldmine.  They took the best of the WWF and added in the thing it lacked -- the actual fight.  How can a WWF fan not love watching the UFC - it's like the WWF on steroids.  And, like it or not, UFC is hot.  It is growing exponentially, and it is because of the characters involved.

Boxing lacks those characters.  What happens when Floyd Mayweather Jr, Oscar De La Hoya, and Bernard Hopkins disappear?  What happens when Klitschko or Hatton hang up the gloves?  Can Hollyfield's comeback sustain boxing?  There are very few matchups that can draw the big crowds and pay per view revenues, and it is the lack of showboating that keeps boxing out of the limelight.  The boxers are all too similar.  The names we remember are the ones who distinguish themselves from the pack in some regard, and relying on an undefeated record won't necessarily do it, unless you are dedicated boxing fan.  The masses remember the character, not the statistics.  Tyson, like him or not, is a household name.  He distinguished himself twice -- once as a boxing superstar and then his most recent reincarnation.

Boxing vs UFC: What happens when boxing meets UFC?Boxing vs UFC: What happens when boxing meets UFC?UFC on the other hand, has lively characters, costumes and outrageous entrances.  Their fighters are the superheros kids will trade trading cards of.  And the blood is an added bonus.  The perceived brutality of the "no holds barred" fighting seems wholly uncivilized to a boxing purist when in reality UFC and MMA in general has fewer serious injuries than boxing.  It seems one slamming concussive punch that draws blood or knocks out teeth is actually better for you than repeated concussive blows to the head (especially in later rounds when you are dehydrated).  UFC has yet to count a fatality while boxing adds a few to the list every year.

As a boxer, I think our sport can learn a lot from the UFC and MMA, especially in terms of making it more appealing to a new generation brought up on video games and superheroes.  Everyone likes the dramatic and the story behind the fighter.  I have no doubt that the fighters in MMA are as athletic and as dedicated to their sport as boxers.  I've done some MMA and know the same principles of battle exist.  MMA fighters are more rounded, complete fighters and boxing is a big part of their standup game.  I don't think anyone can really disagree with that observation.  Without training, a MMA fighter would destroy a boxer on the ground.

I guess it all boils down to the fact that MMA takes the best of all the combat sports, combines them and pits them against each other.  Thus, it draws the fans from all disciplines.  To any purist of any sport, that in itself will be offensive and will be perceived as a threat against their "culture".  To the UFC, that works to their advantage as the discussions shine even more light on MMA.

Average: 4 (1 vote)


psycho's picture

opinion

What do u all think about ufc? me personally dont like to use my feet to fight but do a lot of boxers like ufc. tell me thx
MossH521's picture

To be honest, I think UFC is

To be honest, I think UFC is not comparable to boxing. Yes, I respect all athlethes who participate in the sport however, it seems very primative to me. I've watched a ton of UFC, K-1, and Pride fights and in summation, it is not something I would to do. Elbows, knees, and submissions are just not something I think are "civilized" nor humane. It just seems kind of primative and like street fighting. Men use their fists and fists only. Boxing is such a respectful sport. UFC just doesn't seem to compare.
Guests's picture

To say elbows and knees are

To say elbows and knees are primitive and real men use their hands is probably the most illogical thing I have ever heard. MMA is the closest thing to what actually would work in a real fight although there are some rules. There are troops fighting in wars all over the world from all different countries shooting people. The same troops are defending their lives with tactics learned from arts such as boxing, kick boxing, jiu jitsu and many more(which is M.M.A). To call this sport primitive is an oxymoron considering the bottom line is both boxing and MMA is violence and nothing else. Think about that and then see how real men fight.
kami22's picture

I have a lot of respect for

I have a lot of respect for MMA. Both the fighters and the ideals behind the "sport". I think MossH was touching on something that I agree with to a degree when he was calling it "uncivilized". I see boxing as true sport. When I say "true sport" i mean it is the most natural, honest form of competition. Individual against individual, unlike other sports (which truly are just games) there are no teams, and there is no artificial tool (a ball), or object (a net/goal, etc...). All the competitors have are their own bodies; and the outcome of the contest is decided solely on the skill of their limbs, their level of intelligence, and the strength of their wills. However, even in boxing their is an element of the inhumane or the primitive; afterall, the goal is still to hurt your opponent, either by KO or by decision, you are still inflicting damage. What makes it more sport, though, is the presence of rules. A fighter can only use his fists, there are gloves (even if their intention is primarily to protect the fighter's hands, as opposed to his opponents brain), there is the referee; and any number of limitations that make the act of boxing a controlled and "scientific" thing.

Now for MMA (be it UFC or other orgs) there are still rules/limitations, there are just less of them. To me MMA represents true combat (as opposed to sport). A good MMA fight seems like both men are fighting for their lives, because in essence, they are. How many times have you seen guys fail to tap while being choked and actually slip into unconsciousness; or guys literally being pummelled into senselessness. If it weren't for the ref the losing fighter very well could die in the ring. This, in many ways, legitimizes MMA as a true contest between men, but I would be hard pressed to call it a sport. It is combat, war between two individuals, and at its root, very primitive indeed. However, the level of skill is no less than boxing, nor the fighter's dedication and courage. While primitive at heart, the methods and techniques that go into it, are ancient; and through centuries of practice have become highly evolved (just like boxing, which, let's not forget, is also a martial art). I have a lot of resepct for anyone who trains to compete in the martial arts, especially MMA fighters because they have to be versed in so many different disciplines. There's a lot dedication and heart involved.

 Here's something to consider though, when mentioning "uncivilized and inhumane" about discussions of boxing or MMA. There are at least six deaths a year in the sport of boxing. To date, there have been no deaths in the UFC. It's funny: MMA is about delivering swift and immediate damage to your opponent; whether it's by wrenching a limb out of it's socket, or thundering down 2-3 blows to knock them unconscious. Boxing, on the other hand, is more of a prolonged sort of torture. Any one who has been knocked around (with or without headgear) for even just four rounds in a boxing ring can tell you...it hurts; your face feels swollen and hot, and your brain pulses in your head. The constant rattling of the brain is what ultimately shortens a fighter's competitive life, renders them punch-drunk in later age, and in the worst of situations kills them. Look at a majority of MMA fighters, and they are almost never slurred in speech or displaying any of the all to typical symptoms of pugilistic parkinsons. In boxing, on the other hand, you'll find seasoned, veteren amateurs, kids who are in their early twenties, who display these symptoms. It's the number of blows to the head that are such an essential part of boxing that make it so damaging, and so dangerous a sport. Though it will always be "the sweet science", boxing can still be brutal, and it's hard to say that it is any less so than MMA.

psycho's picture

thx

guys thx for the comments i didnt know if boxers like ufc or mma thx alot
Guests's picture

Personally i feel that the

Personally i feel that the ufc is more exciting than boxing because during a boxing match you know what is going to happen there both gunna throw jabbs, hooks, and uppercuts but in mma there is the take down, ground and pound, submisstion, ref stoppage due to a cut, tko (tec knock out), and a knock out. Dont get me wrong i have a great deal of respect for any fighter but if a boxer and a ufc fighter get into a fight who is gunna win? the guy that can only punch or the guy who can kick you in yhe head, punch you in the head or tackle you and beat you on the ground or choke you until you pass out. As a mma fighter i study boxing 4 times a week and it is a important role in my fights but i just feel that mma fighter are just tougher that boxers and def. more exciting.
Guests's picture

mma vs. boxing

As a MMA fighter I've heard that my sport isn't civilized, or it's primitive, or street fighting. Thats all wrong, yes I agree that Boxing has been around for ever and has set the standerds in the fighting world. But to say that kicking is wrong or useing your elbows or knees shouldn't be allowed in the ring, I say why not. It takes more skill to watch for hands, elbows, knees, feet, and take downs. To be able to use every object of your body as a wepon takes a lot of skill. I'm not saying Boxing does'nt take a lot of skill, Boxing is a skill all in it's own. But as far as MMA being primitive or street fighting. Comeon we have rules just like Boxing, we train just as hard as boxers. It's just that MMA gives you more freedom than just your hands to inflict damage on your apponiant.
Lil Smoky's picture

opinion 2

i think ufc is just a lilt better then boxing be cues if you goth then use it. is wath i say why just use my hand wen i can also use my legs to win a figth and it help u become a why better defends and stamina and in the real strret figth i imagine it helps to and + would in it be cool ass hell to K.O some one with a kik
Guests's picture

MMA Is gr8

Actually I am a Mixed Martial Artist and I do no boxing whatsoever I simply do Muay Thai And Jiu Jitsu Boxing Is great but it is really boring 2 watch and I have seen Mixed martial artists beat boxers at boxing my friend Bryan Travers beat Billy Bailey at boxing and mixed martial artists have many more skills than a boxer kicking is for men would u call Bruce Lee A girl? have u ever took a kick 2 the leg? It hurts like hell and in a street fight a boxer would easily loose especially if they loose there leg do 2 leg kicks for they will have no base
Galen Knotts's picture

Boxing vs MMA

First I want to say that as a fighter of anykind you would have to respect and incorporate all types of styles and skills into your style,as a way of being fully prepared for any opponent.So I believe that boxing is a crucial as submissons and takedowns.Because they all have the ability to change and possibly end the fight and all are exciting to see.In my opinion boxing is vital to MMA fighters as well as ground game.Boxing is the purest form of striking and in-close fighting you can get.Quentin Jackson's takedowns with Joe Fraziers hooks.There are so many MMA fighters that I see that could really benefit from boxing that it would evolve the sport itself into a whole new level of MMA.At the same time MMA fighters and boxers dont but should respect each other because,we do what most cant.We fight.I love boxing and MMA both have brought my confidence and skill up a great amount.Hopefully with time more stars of the MMA and boxing world will learn to train and improve their skill while both worlds will continue to grow and prosper.I believe as we see more MMA fighters learn and master the art of boxing we will see more fighters in the UFC,PRIDE,BoDog,emerge as champions and top contenders for title fights.You say boxing vs MMA,I say boxing completes MMA.Thanks for the opportunity to speak on such topic.
MossH521's picture

First off, MMA isn't boxing

First off, MMA isn't boxing and boxing isn't MMA. You have to understand they are 2 entirely different sports. Boxing is boxing and MMA is MMA. An MMA'er doesn't box and a boxer doesn't "MMA". Thats why MMA call it striking and not boxing. Yes, MMA draws from the punches, however, it is far different from the boxing actually boxers partake in. Guest, you say kicking with your feet is like man. I don't think so, real men have always faught with their fists. Who kicks, seriously?
kami22's picture

primitive

I don't know....my girlfriend kicks pretty hard. Ha!!

I wouldn't say that calling boxing/MMA primitive is an "oxymoron" (it is not a statement that contradicts itself...sorry,I was an English major). Violence is at the heart of both, and neither could exist without it. However, I think that's why it is primitive. We live, supposedly, in a "more refined" world. Combat sports are, in essence, blood-sports; and comparisons can be drawn to the gladiatorial days of Rome. In fact, boxing in its original form was as follows: Two romans would sit facing each other, sometimes with their legs bound so that they could not rise. The two combatants would then proceed to batter each other until one was dead. There was no movement, none of the finesse that we find in modern boxing. Eventually, the romans invented the cestus (the original "glove" used by boxers), which was a leather strap that wrapped around the fist and was lined with metal studs. This was used to make the punches more capable of incapacitating and eventually killing the other fighter. That is primitive. It was a primitive age. The sport evolved eventually, and the Romans took to their feet, and boxing then began to resemble more of what we see today. Now, some two thousand years later we've come a long way, and so has boxing. But it's root still comes from something that should go against our more evolved sense of humanity. It's violence for the sake of entertainment, or in some cases for a prize. The fact that the "bottomline" of boxing is violence, is what makes it primitive.

Guests's picture

But MMAer's don't box!

But MMAer's don't box!
Guests's picture

yea but they do all the same

yea but they do all the same things as a boxer plus more for ex. kicks, take downs, sprawl, ground and pound, submissions, survival mode, and plus in boxing when you fall the guy cant hit you but in mma you fall your still about the get messed up just like in a real fight
dskillz24's picture

i agree with guest alot of

i agree with guest alot of mma fighters box for ex. Jens pulver Chuck liddell Nick Diaz Nate Diaz Cro Cop Mike Swick Matt Hughes Spencer Ficher Tim Sylvia Anderson Silva Sean Sherk And alot of other fighters who are not mentioned but can still bang with a boxer in stand up only even the ufc president Dana White was a boxer when he was in his 20's
MossH521's picture

MMA and boxing are 2

MMA and boxing are 2 different sports everyone. MMA's don't BOX. 2 completely different sports with different skills, techniques, and such. Yes, there is some overlapping, however, it is a mistake to say that an MMA fighter could beat a boxer at BOXING. It is also a mistake to say that a boxer could beat an MMA fighter at MMA. They don't do the same thing as a boxer because MMA fighters don't plan to only use their fists, don't wear boxing gloves, and do not box in a boxing ring. MMA ISN'T BOXING. Boxing is boxing. MMA is MMA. I don't know why you all MMA'ers think you could beat a boxer at boxing. You guys don't box, you strike.
MossH521's picture

And by the way, just because

And by the way, just because you can throw a jab or some combos, doesn't mean you box. Saying MMA'ers box is like saying pro baseball players play pro football. They aren't the same sport. Yes, I have utmost respect for MMA fighters and their heart and dedication. No, I do not think MMA fighters box because they don't. If you can find an MMA fighter who can beat a boxer at boxing, please let me know.
dskillz24's picture

No one ever said that a mma

No one ever said that a mma fighter could beat a boxer in boxing. But when i train i trian with 20 oz gloves in a boxing ring. MMa is not just in a cage there is the IFL, Pride and many other mma groups that fight in a ring. From what i have seen almost every mma fighter trains in boxing or striking they use the same gloves, the same bags, the same tec, and the same foot work. I feel the only reason that mma fighters "strike" is so this arguement dosent come up during every fight. Overall at least 80% of mma fighters (including me) train and study boxing at least 4 time a week. Boxers only box and mma fighters fight mma but most mma fighters do train the same way with the same equiptment and i am sure if a mma fighter was to fight a boxer the boxer would win but if the mma fighter had a chance to train for that fight as he does for an mma fight he would at least put up a fight in my oponion. No disrespect to anyone out there who disagrees with me but thats the way i feel everyones got there own oponion.
Guests's picture

Not really, MMA'ers strike

Not really, MMA'ers strike differently then boxers. I think its just a different sport. They are completely separate. You can't say MMA'ers box just because boxing may or may not be apart of their training routine, just as you can say boxers aern't MMA fighters just b/c they box (which may or may not b part of MMA). I still don't believe MMA is boxing, nor that MMA's box.
dskillz24's picture

i agree they are both two

i agree they are both two different sports but all i am saying is that mma fighter do train in boxing and do study boxing in their routine
MesaJr151's picture

Two different sports

After reading about this debate for so long I've come to the conclusion that they a two different sports. Depending on who could execute there skill first would determine the winner. If boxing was to be organized by one, then the sport would be better off. Until they hire me to make the sport better I think they'll slowly become the lil brother to the UFC and MMA.
kaxola's picture

I wonder

Please this is just for conversation, Mike Tyson in his prime against Quentin Jackson or Chuck Lidell? I feel who ever has their A game on that day will win, what do you think?
Guests's picture

See tyson is one of those

See tyson is one of those boxers I think would of transitioned over to MMA very well... But if quinton is smart and takes a shot on tyson or clinchs with tyson and takes him to the ground... tyson wouldnt last long :/
vitro's picture

im just waiten to see a

im just waiten to see a boxer transition over to MMA and hit a guy with a real power shot flush on the chin or anywhere on his face....i really think theyd need to call an ambulance
allentd's picture

Mixed Martial Artist

I am an amature MMA fighter and I have been following MMA since the begining. I am also a fan of boxing and the sport. I use Muay Thai and a little boxing for my stand up skills. I am very versed in submissions and wrestling and can tell you from personal experience that you cant put a boxer in the same catagory as an MMA fighter. Of course a boxer will beat an MMA fighter at boxing with traditional gloves on. The thing is MMA fighters now days are so well rounded they can hang with a boxer on there feet. Say for instance you take a good technical striker in MMA (Rampage Jackson or Randy Couture) and put them in a boxing ring. They could stand up with the best boxing has to offer. Now im not saying they would win by any means, but they would hold there own. With that said if you took a boxer like Mayweather Jr or De la hoya and put them in the UFC cage against a well rounded fighter like BJ Penn or Matt Hughes. The boxer would'nt last a round. I am not trying to bash boxing I love the sport its great, but MMA fighters are so talented its just an amazing thing to watch. As far as people saying MMA is'nt a sport and that its uncivilized is just ignorance. Using elbows, Knees, and kicks does'nt make it primative, kickboxers have been using all of these methods for years and nobody says anything about that. MMA has taken the best fighting styles: Muay Thai, kick boxing, boxing, Brazilian Jiu jitsu, judo, and wrestling and created an amazing sport out of it. Any amature boxers out there who think MMA fighters cant hang I'll make you a proposition. We can go 3 rounds in a boxing ring and then we will go 3 rounds in an MMA ring.
MesaJr151's picture

MMA vs. Boxing

I somewhat agree with you. This topic will never go away until we get two warriors from both sports in one ring. I got to say it would be stupid for any fighter to get into a ring without any training for that particular fighting style. What i'm getting at is if u trained a boxer for 90 days some basics in MMA, do you not think that he could survive 3 5 minute rounds? I can only assume that an MMA fighter, with all they train for, can endure a 12 or 10 round boxing match. So, let me know what you think?.... Keep fightin, keep fightin, keep fightin for more! (Walter Payton)
allentd's picture

Reply to MesaJr151

I deffinitely believe if you take a good boxer and give him 90 days to train MMA to prepare for a fight vs another MMA fighter that the boxer would hang in there. This is depending on the fighters of course. For the boxer to be successfull they would need to train 90% of the time in Jui Jitsu, takedown defense, and wrestling and spend the other 10% keeping there stand up skills in tact. This would be no easy task though learning Jui Jitsu and the ground game is no joke. It would take a lot of dedication and a lot of long training days in the gym. You couldnt take a champion boxer and throw them in the octagon with someone like Matt Hughes, Randy Couture, or Anderson Silva. Maybe over time after 5-8 fights the boxer would transition into an MMA fighter and be able to challenge a prime MMA fighter like the names I listed above. I would like to see it happen though and I belive eventually it will. I know Mayweather did a lot of bad mouthing of MMA fighters and the UFC during his preparations for the De La Hoya fight. He made the comment that he would step in the cage vs the best the UFC had to offer in his weightclass. After the fight Mayweather retracted his statements and said he was just hyping up the fight. I would have like to see him keep his word and train for an MMA fight. He would have gotten beaten pretty bad if he would have fought the UFC lightweight champ Sean Sherk, but I think he would hang in there if he was to fight a lesser of a MMA fighter.
MesaJr151's picture

allentd

Good reply...It would be pretty awsome to see happen, but the weight class I would like to see it go down in is heavy. If u take a great athelete like Klitchko (forgive the spelling, too many blows to the head), and match him against a heavy in UFC think the outcome would be any different considering the power the heavy's produce? In the end "who knows" I guess. It is a good debate. Again thanks for the reply, and i'm out, gotta hit the gym...lol...Any good training tips on the bags? or at all? hit me up with another reply!
allentd's picture

MesaJr151

I think the Heavy weight division would be the most interesting simply because the heavy weights are less technical then the lower weight classes. Randy Couture vs Klichko would be an interesting match because Randy is more well rounded then other heavyweights. One good one I have for the heavy bag is get in a fighting stance and for 3 minutes throw as many 1-2 combos you can to the head. I like this one because it stimulates the fast twitch muscles that help you punch faster. After you do the 1-2 combos to the head do it to the body for 3 minutes. Then do it for 1 minute to the head, dont focus on technique or power the key is quick punches. Lastly same thing 1 minute to the body. Also I recomend slipping if you dont already do that in your workouts. Its great for staying in the pocket and dodging punches.
Prodigal Son's picture

90 days in MMA vs. guys who

90 days in MMA vs. guys who have been perfecting their takedown defense and subs for years? Boxer's don't even know how to check leg kicks, deal with the clinch, elbows, knees, high kicks. The bob and weaving habits wouldn't transition well to MMA, they would have to learn takedown defense, subs/sub defense, there are just many things that boxers train that would not transition well into MMA and vice versa. Even the stance would have to change, they don't even throw the jab the same, MMA fighters take elements of western boxing and mix it into their bag of tricks...it doesn't even constitute all of their stand up preparation, many of them train in Muay Thai. All those beautiful moves that you see with boxing or Muay Thai or K-1 don't translate so well to MMA. A boxer would own a MMA fighter under boxing rules, a MMA fighter would own a boxer under MMA rules. They are both combat sports and should benefit from each other, not constantly bitter-batter trash talk. Randy in that video really hit the mark on the head, many MMA fighters are huge fans of boxing and other combat sports.
allentd's picture

Preaching to the choir

My man im with you on this one. Notice I said if you give a good boxer 90 days to train nothing but the other aspects of MMA other than stand up they would "hang in there" vs an average MMA fighter. Then I said if you were to put them up against a real contender they would get beat down. I train MMA 6 days a week Jui-Jitsu and stand up are my foundation. I have followed MMA since day 1 and I have loved it ever since. I have a lot of respect for boxers even though I am not a boxer I base a lot of my striking and workouts off boxing technique and so does ever other good fighter in MMA. Muay Thai is another dicipline I have been training for my arsenal and it is no joke. Look at for instance Anderson Silva he doesnt look like a very powerfull guy, but get caught up in his Muay Thai clinch and your going to end up like Rich Franklin did when they fought "busted up". Do you box or train MMA?
MesaJr151's picture

good input

Good input fellas. I agree with the comments on the different styles and skills. allentd, i'm not sure if u was askin me if i box or train, but ya I'm currently doin some boxin to get to a decent fight weight. I know some basic MMA that may or may not help on the street (self defense). Thanks for the tips too. We currently do burn outs on the heavy bag too for like 30 seconds and a few reps. Its good for some quick flurries. As for the debate on boxing vs. mma I must also conclude that they are two different sports but similar in that their both combat. Good luck to u all and lets keep this site flowin. Also in case u never seen it, check out some rossboxing.com....its got some kool attributes.
Luke_Boxer_07's picture

boxing wins

i think ufc is good. i wach the ultimate fighter and somtimes wach ufc tourns on tv. But boxing defintly is the sport to pick. No1 boxing is so much safer i think. look at ufc gloves compared to aiba approved boxing gloves! and in boxing you don't ALI run up 2 his oppentent and knee him in the nose. unless your talking about TYSON and HOLYFEILD poor guy i bet his ear still hurts today. only joking i respect all them fighters but i think... 'THINK' that if ricky hatton say or some one big like that had a bout with a mma ufc i think ufc would win beacuse there good at boxing with martail arts annd wresting. most boxers would be superb at boxing and utter chaos in the other 2 but i still think boxing is better then mma or ufc
admin's picture

It's not safer

Just to be clear, boxing has had over a thousand deaths, UFC has had 1. There is something to be said for a quick knockout vs repeated punishment for 12 rounds under increasingly dehydrated conditions.
Guests's picture

Come on guys, you think that

Come on guys, you think that MMA is that easy to learn? You guys should try it out then. I notice that all the guys who don't like MMA doesn't have any real knowledge of the game. Everyone knows boxing, it's been around forever! and it's a great sport. But to make a judgement about MMA without knowing nothing about it is just plain ignorance. You guys see them on the ground not knowing the techniques and how difficult it is to pull them off, and you guys think they're just laying there holding eachother. These guys who you think suck on the ground because they get submitted easily.. they've been training for years on the the ground, it's just that the other guy has been training longer and is that much better. All MMA fans know boxing, we grew up with boxing and we decide which sport is better from there... Guys who don't know anything about MMA and like to think they do, that's the hater's of the sport... Learn some techniques and try them out, see how it feels to get armbarred or choked out and how to work for positions then you guys will appreciate the sport. One more thing! if you really want to learn how to defend chokes and armbars and takedown defenses and be good at it, you have to learn all the offenses too. Just then when you start learning the defenses(which is not part of boxing), you are now technically a Mixed Martial Artist.

mtn's picture

I think it all boils down to

I think it all boils down to two very different sports with two very different sets of rules...but both disciplines share the desire to incapacitate their opponent. I think that is why most people feel they have more in common than they actually do. Both sports are extremely difficult to rise to the top...I don't think there is any debate in that. MMA requires a knowledge of so many more techniques....including elements of boxing, but I don't think any superstar of boxing could compete with a superstar of MMA or vice-versa if competing in each others respective arenas. Boxing is looked at as a more refined sport because those that have mastered the art have in fact refined their "striking skills" to a razors edge. I'm a cabinetmaker, and as a cabinetmaker I have to complete a large number of wookworking processes with some degree of proficiency to arrive at a quality product. The product is , however, judged as a whole completed unit. If I was specialized in only one of the large number of processes, such as finishing, I would, indeed, be able to do a better job in that particular area than someone who does everything. Its really a matter of focus and the finite amount of time and dedication to each individual task that every human being must comply with. Boxing is a more focused form of combat than MMA. I don't think that point makes it greater or lesser than MMA. Its just more specialized, and specialization refines a process ....which in this case is striking with the fists. The gym where I train is a boxing gym, although many of the guys that come there are competing in MMA. I almost always end up sparring with an MMA guy because they are the guys that are on par with me in weight(heavyweight). There just are not any boxers at this particular gym that are close to me in weight for some reason. Anyway, I always thought that MMA would require more endurance than boxing....It just seemed logical to me, but I have been told by every MMA guy that they find boxing much more demanding physically than MMA. I had a hard time believing them, but they always gas before I do, and when they gas they get knocked down. Always...and it should be noted that I am at least 10-15 years older than every one of them that I have sparred with, and by boxing standards I have a considerable way to go to be able to say I'm in good boxing condition. Am I a superior man....Nope...they are just playing by the rules of my chosen sport...rules that they have not conditioned themselves to deal with in the most proficient manner. That said, I have no illusions that I could stand up to them if I had to compete in "their" sport. I couldn't. They would have me wrapped up and tapping in no time. The two are just way too different, despite the obvious similarities, to be considered comparable. Its the whole, "my dad could beat up your dad" thing that everybody gets hung up on. Sure.... but by what set of rules?

Guests's picture

Okay first of all on this

Okay first of all on this website you are mainly talking to boxers and none of them would put their pride aside to say that MMA is the better of the 2. I mean honestly, since UFC has hit its prime in the last couple of years boxing has just been in the shadows of UFC. You can walk up to various people on the streets and ask them if they know 2 out of 3 well known boxers that you name and then 2 out of 3 well known MMA fighters and the outcome will be of no shock that the MMA fighters will win. I think boxing is a great sport that added to alot of a MMA fighters technique but in the long run MMA has baically evolved boxing into all the things it could be but wasnt. point blank, no disrespect to boxers but you should give repsect where its needed. And might i add that i read most of the comments about this topic and to say MMA is any less than boxing is almost humerous in fact why do people mainly watch Fighting events? You wnat to see something close to an actual fight why would you stick to something that all you can do its just bang while standing, personally id rather wacth something that is more realistic when you are in a fight you are no limited to what you can and cannot do your going all out for that fight take it or leave it. A boxer only knows how to box, mainly why boxers stay with boxing and dont transition to MMA and if they do, they are no one mainstream. MMA definitely is not any less of a sport than boxing its probably greater when you look at all the aspects of what it takes to combine an MMA fighter.

mtn's picture

Well, you can't argue with

Well, you can't argue with logic like that.

Breakinankles99's picture

MMA is tight, my cousin does

MMA is tight, my cousin does it, but people dont watch boxing to see somthing close to a real fight (not me, at least) people watch boxing because theres nothing sweeter than watching two men master standing close to each other, perfecting the art of hitting and not to get hit.
UFC is like this- you get clocked, you go down.. and everyone who "likes a real fight" dosnt wanna see a 4 min. roll around till one taps out.
no disrespect to MMA fighters(theyre tough as hell)
just half as disciplined.

David "Fairlady" Nativi's picture

MMA and Boxing

dudes, both sports are WAY dirfferent then each other.! In MMA you have to master your kicks, your elbows and knees(if you use them), and punches, ground moves, submissions that you have to master.. And in boxing in the other hand, you have to master your punches, your hooks, jabs, straights, and uppercuts in the game, you have to be accurate on your shots, you have to make openings in the body and the face, MMA you can kick shins or a legal part of the body, common you think a boxer can kick a a dude in the head that easily.? Or do you think a MMA fighter has the same boxing skills as a boxer.? Both sports are different from each other in every way, and no boxing is not better then MMA, neither is MMA better then boxing.
Guests's picture

thats not true! BOX AND MMA

thats not true! BOX AND MMA ARE DIFFERENT ! BUT THAT DOSENT MEAN THAT MMA IS NOT BETTER THAN BOXING , I UNDERSTAND WHY A LOT OF BOXING FANS CANT THINK THIS BECAUSE BOX HAS BEEN THE NUMBER 1 SPORT FOR SO LONG , BUT LIKE EVERYTHINK IT DIES OR CHANGE , I THINK MMA IS THE EVOLUTION OF BOX , BECAUSE IT INCLUDES BOX AND A LOT OF MARTIAL ARTS , JUST REMEMBER WHAT BRUCE LEE SAID , IF YOU ARE GOING TO TRAIN YOURSELF TO FIGHT ( IN A RING , CAGE , STREET ) YOU BETTER TRAIN YOURSELF TO USE EVERY PART OF YOUR BODY! IT DOSENT MATTER THAT ITS A SPORT OR COMBAT , THE POINT IS TO BEAT THE MAN INFRONT YOU JUST WITH DIFFERENT RULES! A BOXER JUST HAVE HIS HANDS! A MMA FIGHTER HAD ALL HIS BODY , EVEN HIS WEIGHT WHEN HE USE WRESTLING , SO A BOXER HAS NO CHANCE VS A MMA FIGHTER IN A REAL FIGHT! SO WHATS THE POINT BEING THE BOX CHAMPION IF A GOOD MMA FIGHTER WITH NO TITLE CAN BEAT HIM??? THEN WHY HE TRAINS AND KILLS HIMSELF IN THE GYM! MAN ALWAYS BEEN DRUNK WITH POWER! TO BE SUPERIOR ITS JUST IN THE DNA OF MAN! SINCE EVER! SINCE HAVING A BIGGER ROCK , A BETTER SWORD! A BETTER GUN , AND NOW MAN VS MAN ITS JUST BEING THE BETTER MAN! JUST FACE IT BOX TIME IS ALMOST OVER! MMA IS THE FUTURE AND YOU CAN SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT TO ME , BUT TIME WILL PROVE ALL BOXING FANS WRONG , NOT ME !
Guests's picture

I think the poster that

I think the poster that talked about the cabinet making process is right. A fight is just refinement of the process of a man achieving physical dominance over another man. The more rules you add the further away from reality and closer you get to sport. Boxing is a little more refined/specialized than MMA. Boxers focus on only one aspect of fighting, hand strikes. That does not elevate boxing per se. Just specializes it. That does not lessen MMA. MMA is wonderful and strategic also. Problem is that a boxing fan just can't "get it". Everyone has gotten into a sloppy fist fight. They can relate to boxing. You kind of have to roll to appreciate the technical side of MMA. They view fighting through the boxing lens. They just see "sloppy" boxing and grabbing. Like listening to a conversation in a foreign language and saying, "They are just blabbering!" Which is more effective? That is a trick argument and it always starts, "If a boxer and an MMA practitioner got into a..." Here is why. If a boxer trains in kick, knee, take down, and submission defense to bang with an MMA guy isn't he now an MMA practitioner? MMA is only modifying a fight within the rule set to your strengths and away from your opponents strengths. You decide the strengths, strategy, and deficits of your style. So aren't ALL boxers or any other martial art practitioner technically limited MMA athletes under a more refined rule set?
drewdondude's picture

Boxing and MMA

Boxing is a sport. Kick boxing is a sport. Jiu-Jitsu is a sport. As a practitioner of all three of these sports I find it hard to compare them against each other. It is like having a basketball team face off with a football team but they have to play soccer. MMA mixes to different sports while boxing is one sport. I think boxing is meant for a more purist audience while the MMA tries to reach a larger audience. This would probably explain why the MMA has become so popular it no longer focuses on one sport but a whole genre of sports.
Zrazys's picture

My view

For those that think that any UFC fighter would be able to hang in with a boxer in a boxing match, or fist fight, you really don't understand boxing. Neither Rampage, or Liddell have to defensive skills, or the chins to handle what a boxer can dish out with his fists. However, that's probably the only advantage a boxer has over an MMA fighter as an all around fighter. If the fight would include kicks and, grappling, he would have to go for a quick knockout. The longer the fight went, he'd likely fall prey to the other skills. Of course, I don't think any MMA fighter could handle a top Muay Thai fighter in a stand up fight. And, stand up fighting is what the fans want to see, as well as the promoters. The problem is the takedowns and, while to Muay Thai guy has more skills, he'd be lost on the ground as well.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

I have always adhered to two principles. The first one is to train hard and get in the best possible physical condition. The second is to forget all about the other fellow until you face him in the ring and the bell sounds for the fight.
— Rocky Marciano

Recent Readers

Quick Stats

Total Boxers: 6797
Total Boxing Gyms and Trainers: 245